VisualAge Pacbase Concepts and Facilities course and have an understanding of Structured Code concepts. Also, you are expected to have thoroughly read. PACBASE generated COBOL code for the servers, and Visual Age for PACBASE was used to create the client side. IBM purchased CGI in the. Pacbase™ is a CASE tool used to develop core applications for about 40 years. It was initially developed by a French IT service company, CGI, to avoid the.

Author: Kigami Mukazahn
Country: Saint Lucia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Technology
Published (Last): 16 May 2015
Pages: 451
PDF File Size: 2.90 Mb
ePub File Size: 3.83 Mb
ISBN: 580-8-57778-920-3
Downloads: 86901
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Grojin

Well… EGL sounds like: Site icon by Deiby Vargas. Because Pacbase practicers and experts tend to retire they are as old as te technology. Hanniet Home Music Pacbase tutorial Language: Pacbase tutorial is not true with a CASE tool as some parts of information are held in black-boxes: So, IBM announced the end of Pacbase maintenance in the next years.

PACBASE For Mainframe Is Not Rocket Science! Here’s Why

Pacbase is mainly but not exclusively used by some big french companies, which made this choice a long time ago. Regardless the pro and cons of such pacbase tutorial choice e. Do pacbase tutorial need a picture? If sustainability is part of the key pacbase tutorial to take pacbaae consideration, the idea is, at least, not to reproduce the current situation in the future. A brand new one! From a tool provider business perspective, the revenue pacbase tutorial this product is now only made of maintenance fees and can only pacbasee in time as customers will switch to other technologies.


The main, and big, difference between them is that we can get rid of an ALM tool without loosing precious information as the source code and other development assets have been made by humans and are still there, readable. Programs have to be maintained, frequently or not, in an IT ecosystem that goes away from Pacbase technology each day a bit further.

And proposed… nothing clearly as a replacement!

How does it fit to the Company sustainability strategy? And for sure we use, and will use more and more, Software Environments. Why do pacbase tutorial will switch?

JCL Online Training

Choosing a new CASE tool that eventually will fall pacbase tutorial the same kind of dead-end than the current CASE tool is pacbase tutorial sure a weird idea but live is sometimes weird and business too….

There are three keys here: Whatever the programming technology, we use tools. Pacbaze Pacbase developers have to be replaced as they retire one after another, and tend to become more and more expensive.

It could have been another CASE tool: May we choose not to choose a CASE pacbase tutorial Pacbase has then be bought by IBM and is now part of the Rational solutions portfolio.

Pacbase – Wikipedia

In the end, the sustainability strategy leads either to move towards a technology in the development technologies portfolio yet, or to add a new technology to this portfolio and to move towards it.


It can be seen as a pacbase tutorial perspective, or not. A fun path, but not really a smooth one… RPP sounds like: So the product is promised to increasing maintenance costs and decreasing maintenance revenues. One idea behind Pacbase tutorial is probably: Featured image taken from: Sustainability strategy If sustainability is part of the key points to take into consideration, the idea is, at least, not to reproduce the current situation in pacbase tutorial future.

One of the first ideas when thinking about a target may be: And what is the point of maintaining Pacbase-like practices limited to Pacbase practicers that will retire soon or sooner? The pacbase tutorial option leads to adopt EGL: For some reasons, the company wants to get rid of pacbase tutorial CASE tool. And where is the sustainability aim?

It will be the subject of other pacbase tutorial. Whatever the reason, and provided that the application developed using pacbase tutorial CASE tool will still live pachase the future, the Company has to choose a new technology target or several and a way to move towards it.

But there may be other important perspectives!